I've just submitted it to AMO for review (in the meantime, you can load extension/ via about:debugging). Will update the repo with the store link once approved!
vrganj 58 minutes ago [-]
Thank you for your work, much appreciated!
tartoran 5 hours ago [-]
This is great and hope it'll be compatible with more and more browsers.
This should be done by youtube themselves. It's so simple for them to label AI generated content so people can either look for it or avoid it but they won't do it. I'm not sure how they profit from AI gen videos over regular videos...
I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts but there's no way to do it, it's like that by design, Youtube want to shove those in your face so you click on it, even if by accident. Luckily I found a free app to do it (IOS). I absolutely appreciate the effort people put into fighting these companies back.
NotErnie 2 hours ago [-]
In the mobile app you can go to Settings > Time Management > Daily Limits > Shorts feed limit and set it to 0 minutes. It removes all shorts from your home feed.
If you click on a short, or the shorts tab you see "you reached your Shorts feed limit".
And if you click on the subcriptions tab theres only one section of shorts at the top and they don't show up again when you scroll down.
ssernikk 2 hours ago [-]
> This is great and hope it'll be compatible with more and more browsers.
> I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts
I put out shortless [0] for the very same reason...I just hate them. This works only on Safari, but I stopped using the native app altogether a long time ago, so it wasn't that big of a jump for me :)
Shouldn't their presumably unlimited access to Gemini models enable them to implement things like this quickly and easily?
afavour 2 hours ago [-]
Yes but if it’ll lower overall video minutes viewed it’ll never make it into production.
MarioMan 7 hours ago [-]
This is great. Having the option to choose whether or not to see AI content was the first thing I hoped they'd add a filter for when it was first introduced.
My only concern is that I have seen legit videos by creators on the platform for many years, with the tiny "AI (i)" label below the video. I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.
You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.
onion2k 4 hours ago [-]
I have seen this even on channels that are not faceless.
The AI logo doesn't mean "entirely made with AI". It means "significant use of AI detected". If someone uses AI to modify the background of their video (say, to remove a detail) it'll get the label.
ungreased0675 10 hours ago [-]
I’d love a small local model that detects AI voices and blocks the content.
Suppafly 4 hours ago [-]
I'm not even sure you'd need AI for that, there are only like 3 voices that are ever used.
Frannky 4 hours ago [-]
I go on YouTube to watch humans talking, nature and music videos and get an insane amount of AI reviews, AI videos, and AI songs. What I find weird is how they end up at the top. Are people actually watching them, which is why they’re ranked so high? Or is the YouTube algorithm just being exploited? Fortunately, there are keywords that still bring back humans, but it’s so annoying.
Foobar8568 3 hours ago [-]
Take a look at the most viewed videos... It's gross.
Basically 90% are just crap done by computers (pre AI), targeting preschoolers.
karim79 9 hours ago [-]
My pet peeve is the AI generated voices. I absolutely love the cosmology-astrophysics-space stuff. And it can be any crap if it's correct enough and entertaining enough and passive enough that I can fall asleep to it.
But once I detect that the voiceover is AI generated that shit get instablocked forever. It's an instant put-off. Do all the visuals you want with AI as long as they are reasonable but when a human (AI) voice starts to fuck with the way a word has been presented in a particular context then it just makes me want to hate everything I won't mention any names <cough> elevenlabs.
mrweasel 4 hours ago [-]
Many content creators on YouTube may not have English as their first language, so they turn to AI to do the voice over. The thing is, I'd rather listen to broken English read by a human than an AI voice over. The AI voices are off putting and tiresome. It's somehow hurts my brain less trying to process a Chinese person speak bad English. Alternatively for something like YouTube, add subtitles and just speak your own language is much more comfortable than the AI voice-overs.
lynx97 46 minutes ago [-]
Depends. I take an AI generated voice over a french guy trying to talk english every day! Same for japanese. I really try, but I find these two speaker types really hard to follow and stay alert.
shoobiedoo 3 hours ago [-]
This is especially common in Japan now. I was looking for an audio documentary of the crusades and half of them were done in squeaky anime AI voices
kenanfyi 3 hours ago [-]
It's funny the website is generated with AI. I'm kind of sure that the code as well.
vist_orn 2 hours ago [-]
Finally, a way to reclaim my YouTube feed from the AI sludge. Been scrolling past too much uncanny valley lately.
haul_up 3 hours ago [-]
Been waiting for something like this; YouTube's AI detection is wildly inaccurate and just clutters the feed. Installing immediately.
Tajnymag 3 hours ago [-]
The extension relies on YouTube's AI detection, so it won't be any more accurate.
userbinator 5 hours ago [-]
There are tons of human-generated videos on YouTube that aren't worth watching either, and usually can be identified by "screamer" thumbnails and vapid clickbaity titles. I don't think we need to amplify another divisive topic.
yes1would 5 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
userbinator 5 hours ago [-]
...I guess I've wandered into the echo-chamber for the two-minutes-AI-hate?
Flagged and moved on.
pferde 4 hours ago [-]
Oh not at all, the AI hate is actually 24x7, and deservedly so.
yes1would 4 hours ago [-]
Apparently not moved on enough, clanker.
thatmf 12 hours ago [-]
I wish I had this but for every website and media surface
masteranza 12 hours ago [-]
Well, AI flags this content so it's an easy target without heuristics - that's why I've started there.
embedding-shape 11 hours ago [-]
Ironically, if you had this for every website, including GitHub and HN, you wouldn't have seen this HN submission / repository :)
masteranza 11 hours ago [-]
That's also true, you gotta fight fire with fire :)
mikeweiss 10 hours ago [-]
Need the EU, or California or some other large jurisdiction to create a law requiring identifying labels on all AI content
lukeasch21 11 hours ago [-]
This is great, but why start with Safari and not a cross platform browser? Is there something native here that can't be done otherwise or is it just personal preference?
masteranza 10 hours ago [-]
There's plenty of AI blocking Chrome extensions already, however I prefer Safari for personal stuff (and hence YouTube too) and use Brave for Google-gated work related stuff.
Honestly, I've noticed a strange uptick in those videos. This sounds like a perfect solution to clean up the experience.
Schnitz 10 hours ago [-]
I’ve found that the AI label doesn’t necessarily mean AI slop, it just means there’s a non zero amount of AI in the video. I want to avoid AI slop but not all videos that have an AI title screen or whatever.
conmod278 5 hours ago [-]
People think all AI is bad. AI in the hands of expert can create wonders. Take a look below.
Oneiric | AI Sci-Fi Short Film | Higgsfield Originals (2026)
Yeah it's pretty meaningless to see the ai label below videos. Lots of obvious AI shorts and videos are unlabeled yet other videos are labeled as fully generated with AI when they are obviously not [1]
Yep, it's super useless. The label is so general. Was AI used for one image in the 10 minute video? Is the voiceover AI? Is the entirety of it generated with AI? No way to know.
AmazingEveryDay 8 hours ago [-]
Agreed. I think instead of "AI or not", that something more nuanced is needed - perhaps a rating system inspired by the MPAA's (g, pg, pg-13 r, nc-17, x) that is used for movies.
tadfisher 9 hours ago [-]
Now that the AI label exists, the creators using AI for an intro graphic or background music are probably going to stop using it.
Muskwalker 7 hours ago [-]
For a creator posting a video, Google gives specific guidelines on whether to tag it as AI:
"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?
- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do
- Alters footage of a real event or place
- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur
To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"
So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.
masteranza 5 hours ago [-]
If so, that’s indeed a real concern...
arcfour 8 hours ago [-]
Yeah, I make song remixes in the style of a particular video game and while the music is completely human written (by me), I'll often have AI generated or edit the "cover art" for me so people have something to look at/chuckle at.
These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
PixelForg 5 hours ago [-]
> however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)
arcfour 4 hours ago [-]
What's the difference between me pasting a face over a body in GIMP manually and me prompting an LLM to make the same edit, faster, and better than I would by hand? They aren't particularly high-effort. The artwork isn't really the point, but I can't just upload a black video...
Planktonne 2 hours ago [-]
AI-generated anything sends a message of 'I do not care about quality'. You might feel that that's unfair, but it's the impression you're making on a large segment of your potential audience.
altairprime 6 hours ago [-]
Google’s been pushing creators to use AI thumbnails more heavily since right around the EU deadline for labeling, presumably in the hopes of saturating the label so that everyone burns out and eats their slop quietly.
ranger_danger 11 hours ago [-]
You can charge money for browser extensions? And people pay for them?
I'm in the wrong business.
masteranza 11 hours ago [-]
It's free on GitHub for anyone to build, use or fork. I've built it for myself, but going through App Store submissions took me 2x the time, hence the price.
I'm more concerned about the stuff that is fraudulent then possibly legit stuff explicitly labelled as AI
masteranza 11 hours ago [-]
True, but that's a way harder problem to solve. For me what was important was reducing the noise as much as possible as fast as possible consistently. Youtube algorithms has been pervasive enough that anything that moves the scale down even a little bit was worth the effort.
vivzkestrel 5 hours ago [-]
- stupid question: how does this sort of thing work?
- like how do you actually determine if a video was AI made or not?
- what is the algorithm used? what is the threshold for a video to be considered slop?
- what do you do? download the videos with yt-dlp split them into frames and run each frame by what?
ffsm8 5 hours ago [-]
From the pitch itself
> Weedout is a $1.99 Safari extension for macOS that removes videos YouTube labels “Made with AI”
So no, none of that.
Blows my mind if someone pays for that
sshussain270 3 hours ago [-]
Ah! This is useful!
negura 7 hours ago [-]
This is what they mean when they say AI amplifies inequality. If you're technically competent, you just write yourself an extension to block the slop spam, or at least pay to install one. So in the end it's rotting much more the brains of the least prepared.
GaryBluto 2 hours ago [-]
Considering the design and language used on the extension's website I wouldn't doubt it could've been made by someone technically unskilled.
dathinab 10 hours ago [-]
one problem is that algorithms(1) to detect AI generated content are surprisingly bad
like non-AI generated animated/cartoon content is much more likely to be mistakenly labeled as AI then some somewhat realistic "looking" but for a human still clearly AI slop content
some platforms (TickTock) seem to label anything as fully AI generated iff the metadata indicates certain tools like Adobe Illustrator are used, independent on how it was been used
---
(1): If that tool is "ask an AI" then its not surprising at all. It's content which AI tried to make look as realistic as possible, the same (and potentially similar) AI will see it as "as realistic as possible"...
gregjw 10 hours ago [-]
Safari? Of all browsers? Why not start with Chromium?
adav 1 hours ago [-]
I would guess it's because Safari users are happy to pay a little money for an extension whereas most other browser users wouldn't.
flanked-evergl 2 hours ago [-]
YouTube needs a way to report mislabelled AI videos, and actually the "Made with AI" label is a bit misleading. I don't mind if it uses some AI, what I don't want is AI slop, and that can only really be reported by users.
Same with Instagram, they need a way to report AI.
https://github.com/kacperwyczawski/herbisight (herbisight -> herbicide -> weeds, you know)
I've just submitted it to AMO for review (in the meantime, you can load extension/ via about:debugging). Will update the repo with the store link once approved!
This should be done by youtube themselves. It's so simple for them to label AI generated content so people can either look for it or avoid it but they won't do it. I'm not sure how they profit from AI gen videos over regular videos...
I was looking for a setting to turn off Youtube Shorts but there's no way to do it, it's like that by design, Youtube want to shove those in your face so you click on it, even if by accident. Luckily I found a free app to do it (IOS). I absolutely appreciate the effort people put into fighting these companies back.
If you click on a short, or the shorts tab you see "you reached your Shorts feed limit".
And if you click on the subcriptions tab theres only one section of shorts at the top and they don't show up again when you scroll down.
I agree! Just ported it to Firefox, see my other comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49533429
Definitely gonna use it myself.
I put out shortless [0] for the very same reason...I just hate them. This works only on Safari, but I stopped using the native app altogether a long time ago, so it wasn't that big of a jump for me :)
[0]: https://shortless.app
Just for kicks, I inverted the filter in a TamperMoneky script that only keeps the AI-generated content: https://gist.github.com/SMarioMan/32c959d79035cb421df1c69c06...
You would think if anyone could get this right, it would be Google/YouTube, but apparently not.
The AI logo doesn't mean "entirely made with AI". It means "significant use of AI detected". If someone uses AI to modify the background of their video (say, to remove a detail) it'll get the label.
Basically 90% are just crap done by computers (pre AI), targeting preschoolers.
But once I detect that the voiceover is AI generated that shit get instablocked forever. It's an instant put-off. Do all the visuals you want with AI as long as they are reasonable but when a human (AI) voice starts to fuck with the way a word has been presented in a particular context then it just makes me want to hate everything I won't mention any names <cough> elevenlabs.
Flagged and moved on.
Oneiric | AI Sci-Fi Short Film | Higgsfield Originals (2026)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAg9iDh9_BQ
AI is replacing me by kold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGoFUxCmBdA
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3Pdf8iRw5E
"Was AI used to generate or edit your content in any of the following ways?
- Makes a real person appear to say or do something they didn’t say or do
- Alters footage of a real event or place
- Generates a realistic-looking scene that didn’t actually occur
To follow YouTube’s policy, you’re required to tell us about your use of AI. This includes realistic sounds or visuals made or edited with AI. [View examples](https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491)"
So oddly an intro graphic only has to be tagged as AI if it shows a real/realistic person, place, or event, but (per the examples page) apparently any AI-generated music counts.
These videos are still marked as AI, and fairly so; however I don't think that means people should want them hidden :-(
Sorry but no, even if the music is great I don't want to hear it if the cover was AI generated, at this point I'd happily accept even a crudely drawn cover because it is human :)
I'm in the wrong business.
https://support.apple.com/guide/security/app-code-signing-pr...
- like how do you actually determine if a video was AI made or not?
- what is the algorithm used? what is the threshold for a video to be considered slop?
- what do you do? download the videos with yt-dlp split them into frames and run each frame by what?
> Weedout is a $1.99 Safari extension for macOS that removes videos YouTube labels “Made with AI”
So no, none of that. Blows my mind if someone pays for that
like non-AI generated animated/cartoon content is much more likely to be mistakenly labeled as AI then some somewhat realistic "looking" but for a human still clearly AI slop content
some platforms (TickTock) seem to label anything as fully AI generated iff the metadata indicates certain tools like Adobe Illustrator are used, independent on how it was been used
---
(1): If that tool is "ask an AI" then its not surprising at all. It's content which AI tried to make look as realistic as possible, the same (and potentially similar) AI will see it as "as realistic as possible"...
Same with Instagram, they need a way to report AI.